Gambling Times [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Free Newsletter
HomeHome E-zineE-zine Free GamesFree Games Gambling SchoolGambling School Sports BettingSports Betting Back IssuesBack Issues FreebiesFreebies StoreStore Need a Bankroll?Need a Bankroll? TournamentsTournaments Advertise HereAdvertise Here

click here
click here

E-Zine

Home  |  News  |  Articles  |  Archive

Feature Articles

Cal Assembly Passes Internet Gaming "Crime" Bill
by John Hill

Playing to Win
by Ron DeLacey


Recent Articles

Assembly Bill 1229: An Act of Idiocy Which Attacks Personal Freedoms & Privacy
by John Hill

World Serie's of Poker Kicks off at Binions

Another Victory for "Moral Legislation" and a Small Step Backward for Mankind

by John Hill

The Truth About Footballcards
by Ernie Kaufman

The Demise of Las Vegas Poker
by John Hil

Ask Our Experts
Edited by Edwin Silberstang

Caro on Gambling
by Mike Caro

The Future of Casino Gaming
by Stanley Roberts


Archive

The Casinos of Tenerife

by John Hill


Playing To Win

Some say tribes gain an edge with state confusion over rules

By Ron DeLacy

The dials spin and the bells ring and the money rolls in at 44 Indian casinos up and down California.

Billions of dollars are pouring into reservations, enriching the lives of people who were among the nation's poorest just a few years ago.

With their new wealth, they also have new political clout, which helped them expand their casinos and now helps them in a continuing squabble with government officials over regulation.

The state is on the verge of losing control if they don't get their arms around these issues," said Robert Traverso, interim executive director of the California Gambling Control Commission. "These are serious issues."

Among them:

Authority to allocate slot machines among the casinos. The state claims that authority, but doesn't even know how many slot machines are out there.

What to do with nearly $40 million sitting in a trust fund for tribes without casinos. The state has the money and doesn't know where it came from.

The budget for the gambling control commission. It operates now with money borrowed from other state agencies, Traverso said, while the Legislature delays approval of a $1.3 million appropriation. And its proposed $4.7 million budget for next year has been challenged by the Legislative Analyst's Office in a report saying the commission's roles, responsibilities and planned activities are unclear.

To Traverso, what is clear is this: Political power is being exercised by some tribes that "do not want to see the commission function. They don't want the state to be involved in any meaningful way."

Susan Jensen, communications director for the nonprofit California Nations Indian Gaming Association, called that interpretation "absurd," arguing that the tribes accept regulation and oversight from their own gaming commissions, the state and the federal government.

The problem, she said, is that the tribes are helping to finance the governor's gambling commission, so they want to make sure it isn't simply duplicating the work of another state agency, the attorney general's Division of Gambling Control.

But officials of both that division and the governor's Gambling Control Commission say they are having trouble getting critical information.

Since last August, for instance, the commission has received nearly $40 million from casino tribes contributing to a trust fund for tribes without casinos. The payments, required under the tribes' compacts with the state, are based on licenses issued for slot machines -- tribes pay initial license fees and then quarterly fees.

But the tribes, not the state, issued the slot allocations through secret draws, and most of the $40 million came from an accountant who didn't say which tribes contributed, which hadn't, how much was from initial payments or how many slot machines each tribe had.

Meanwhile, in March, the governor issued an executive order that only the commission, not the tribes' accountant, could issue licenses.

So if some of the money came from draws after that order, Traverso said, the state can't keep the money and the tribes can't keep the licenses.

And without an accounting for the money, the commission says it can't distribute the money to the non-gaming tribes. So the money grows in the trust fund, the tribes still control the allocations and the commission wonders how many slot machines are out there.

What the government could do, according to Jensen, is simply go to the casinos and count them. The Division of Gambling Control did that last last year, and came up with a total of 25,196.

Estimates now range from 40,000 to more than 50,000 because several casinos have recently opened or expanded to meet a May 15 deadline.

Casinos that were issued the original licenses a year ago had until May 15 to open shop or put those licenses back into the kitty for distribution later.

Other rules and realities about California's Indian casinos are a lot clearer. Among them:

Nevada isn't happy. A recent study said California's Indian casinos could cost Nevada $24 million to $43 million a year in revenues and up to 16,000 jobs.

None of the California casinos offers roulette or craps. They are still banned under the California Constitution, and they never became a big issue in negotiations over legalizing the casino operations. What the Indians wanted was slot machines, the big moneymaker for any casino.

Some casinos allow alcohol and some don't. If no alcohol is served, gamblers must be 18; otherwise, they must to be 21.

The Jackson Rancheria (no alcohol) in Amador County is one of the biggest and most successful in Northern California, but it took a while. After bingo halls failed three times in the 1980s, Jackson Rancheria matriarch Margaret Dalton opened another one in 1991 that has gradually expanded into a hotel and a 125,000-square-foot casino with 900 slot machines, table games, bingo, two restaurants and a 1,500-seat concert theater. With 1,100 workers, it is by far Amador County's largest private employer.

Sixty percent of net profits must be received by the tribes, and gambling has clearly given Native Americans an economic boost.

"The proof is in the pudding," said Victor Rocha, a Pechanga Indian in Riverside County. "I was raised on welfare, but my niece has a tutor, my sister just bought a home. Kids are going to college. Money is being raised for charities. It has been a true renaissance in the last five years."

Rocha runs a Web site (www.pechanga.net) devoted to news about Native Americans, especially about the gambling issues. He started it when Gov. Wilson threatened to shut down the Indian casinos in 1997.

He continued it through the campaign for Proposition 5, in which Californians approved slot machines and casino expansion, and through court challenges and Proposition 1A, which changed the state constitution to allow slot machines.

"It's been a fascinating tale of luck, drama, suspense and eventually victory," Rocha said. "We finally had the right thing happen for the first time. The Indians won."



Ron DeLacy is a staff writer for the Modesto Bee. He can be reached at 209 984-5150 or rdelacy@modbee.com.

Copyright ©The Modesto Bee


[an error occurred while processing this directive]