 |
 |
 |
 |

I. Nelson Rose
Professor I. Nelson Rose is an internationally known public
speaker, writer and scholar and is recognized as one of the
world's leading authorities on gambling law. A 1979 graduate
of Harvard Law School, he is a tenured full Professor of Law
at Whittier Law School in Costa Mesa, California, where he
teaches one of the first law school classes on gambling law.
Professor Rose is the author of more than 200 articles, books
and chapters on the subject. He is best known for his internationally
syndicated column, Gambling and the Law®, and his landmark
1986 book by the same name. His most recent book -- just released
-- is a collection of columns and analysis on Blackjack and
the Law.
A consultant to governments and industry, Professor Rose has
testified as an expert witness in administrative, civil and
criminal cases and has acted as a consultant to major law
firms, licensed casinos, international corporations, players,
Indian tribes, and local, state and national governments,
including California, Florida, New Jersey, Texas, Washington,
and the federal government of Canada.
With the rising interest in gambling throughout the world,
Professor Rose has been called upon to discuss gambling and
the law before such diverse groups as the National Conference
of State Legislatures, Congress of State Lotteries of Europe,
National Academy of Sciences and the United States Conference
of Mayors. He has presented scholarly papers on gambling in
Nevada, New Jersey, Puerto Rico, England, Australia, Portugal,
Argentina and the Czech Republic.
Gambling
And The Law
rose@sprintmail.com
Current Article by I. Nelson Rose:
Other Articles by I. Nelson Rose:
Nevada A.G. Finds Free Internet Gambling is Still Gambling
Who Won the 2000 Election?
Federal v. State Governments
Will California Licenses Monster?
Is
it a Crime to Give a Casino a Bum Marker?
Attempted Robbery By Lawsuit
Defining Slots-For-Tots
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
Gambling and the Law®:
America Boldly Outlaws (And Quietly Legalizes)
Internet Gambling
by I. Nelson Rose
Governments around the world are responding in different ways to
the explosion of gambling on the Internet:
 |
Some jurisdictions
are setting up strict regulatory systems, complete with licenses,
background checks, controls and, of course, taxes. The Australian
states and territories are setting the standards for the rest
of the world.
Other countries are not as picky. One publicly-held corporation
told the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that it bought
the right to issue licenses from the government of Grenada.
An official from Grenada has reportedly denied this.
Some countries are running the games themselves: Liechtenstein
has a lottery open to almost any adult in the world with a modem.
Although proclaiming this is legal, the small duchy had the
political smarts to close its games to its much more powerful
neighbors, Switzerland and Austria.
Some jurisdictions are passing new laws explicitly prohibiting
Internet gambling. Or so they say. |
The federal and state governments of the
United States are the best examples of how lawmakers can proclaim
publicly that they are outlawing betting on the Internet, while
they actually are taking steps to make it legal.
Nevada was the first state to both outlaw and legalize Internet
gaming.
In July 1997 Gov. Bob Miller signed SB 318, creating the misdemeanor
of making or accepting a bet over the Internet from a player located
in Nevada. SB 318 is a significant step toward the regulation of
the Internet, because it is the first statute to explicitly make
Internet gambling a crime in a state, even if the operator is not
within that state's territory.
But SB 318 is also important for the exceptions it carves out of
its new prohibitions. Making and accepting bets on the Internet
are legal, if the wagers are accepted in Nevada by Nevada-licensed
race and sports books and casinos.
Nevada companies are gearing up to
accept bets by computers. But the State Gaming Control Board is
limiting operators to closed-loop systems: players can bet from
their home personal computers ("PCs"), but their modems will be
connecting the players' PCs directly to the operators' computers.
Bettors cannot use this system to jump to a site on the Internet.
The Board has not issued regulations allowing true Internet gaming.
In fact, it is requiring that the bettor be in Nevada and that the
closed-loop system be able to confirm that no bets are taken from
outside the state.
Nevada is ready to go, to allow its licensees to take bets on the
Internet, as soon as Congress lifts the federal restrictions on
interstate wagers.
Louisiana and Illinois were the next states to act. Although the
Louisiana law is poorly written, they both appear to prohibit all
gambling on the Internet.
But Michigan looks like it is going to follow the precedent created
by the Nevada legislature. On November 3, 1999, the Michigan House
of Representatives passed HB 4689, which would make it a felony
to accept a bet on the Internet. But the bill would exempt Michigan
licensed gaming operations, so long as the operator is expressly
authorized by state law to accept bets over the Internet - none
are, at present.
The legislature thus intends for the Michigan State Lottery, as
well as the state's racetracks, bingo halls and casinos, to eventually
accept bets online.
The most interesting proposal is the Kyl bill, now working its way
through the political maze in Congress. Three years ago, the "Internet
Gambling Prohibition Act," authored by Sen. Jon Kyl (R.-Az), would
have outlawed everything, including online magazines and casino
advertisements.
It's major weakness, besides violating the First Amendment, was
that it would also have made it a federal crime to merely place
a bet. The U.S. Department of Justice, which does not have fond
memories of Prohibition, made it clear that it did not support a
law that would require knocking on bedroom doors to go after $5
bettors. So the Kyl bill had to be amended.
As this is being written, a much revised Kyl bill has passed the
Senate and is pending in the House. In its present form, it outlaws
all Internet gambling... except:
 |
Securities and commodities, as if day-trading was not gambling;
Closed-loop systems for placing bets on horse and dog
races, including from a home PC in one state to an Off Track
Betting operator in another.
Parimutuel pooling of bets between tracks.
State lotteries, including multi-state lotteries, so
long as the betting PC is in a facility open to the general
public.
Bets made for a fantasy sports league game or contest.
|
Politicians may talk Prohibition, but the
future clearly is partial legalization.



Casino Executive #58 ©Copyright 1999, all
rights reserved worldwide. Gambling and the Law® is a registered
trademark of Professor I. Nelson Rose, Whittier Law School, Costa
Mesa, CA.
|